Newspaper that inspires change. Breaking stories that shake the world. Be informed, Don't Settle for Fake News.

feat shape 1
feat shape 2
feat shape 3

Terrifying Depiction: Historian Assesses 34-Year-Old Civil War Movie Battles

Historian Dan Snow confirms the accuracy of 'Glory' in depicting the terrifying and brutal reality of the Civil War battles.

Glory, a 34-year-old Civil War movie, has its battles assessed by historian Dan Snow, who describes the battle as nothing less than "terrifying." The movie accurately depicts the brutality and tactics of the Civil War, particularly the Battle of Antietam. The realistic portrayal of the wounds suffered by Union soldiers and the poor tactical planning reflects the horrors of the Civil War. Although there are some embellishments, such as exaggerated explosion scenes, the overall battle sequences in Glory remain fairly accurate and successfully convey the chaos of the battlefield.

Thirty-four years after its release, a military historian is considering the accuracy of Glory. A war drama centered around the Civil War, the movie is a star-studded depiction of one of the first Black regiments in the American army. Matthew Broderick, Denzel Washington, and Morgan Freeman are all members of the cast, and each has gone on to enjoy stunning careers.

While Glory is best known for its cast, History Hit offered military historian Dan Snow the opportunity to emphasize that it should be renowned for its accuracy. Snow confirms that the movie accurately depicts the Battle of Antietam, emphasizing the realistic battle tactics and the wounds suffered by Union soldiers. He describes the battle as a "terrifying depiction of a Civil War battlefield."

Other historians have also agreed that Glory is accurate in its portrayal of the overall scale of the battle and the strategies employed. The realism of the weapons used, the poor tactical planning, and the reality of horrific injuries are all true depictions of the Civil War. Despite some embellishments, such as exaggerated explosion scenes, the battles remain fairly accurate.

The idea that there were that many explosions is embellished, as Snow explained early in the video. There were explosive rounds, but they were not used quite as often as the other weapons at the Confederacy's disposal. Despite these embellishments, the accuracy of Glory's battle sequences still holds up over three decades after its release.

In conclusion, Glory accurately depicts the brutality and tactics of the Civil War, particularly the Battle of Antietam. The movie's realistic portrayal of the wounds suffered by Union soldiers and the poor tactical planning reflects the horrors of the Civil War. Despite some embellishments, the overall battle sequences in Glory remain fairly accurate and successfully convey the chaos of the battlefield.

Share With Others

Comments on Terrifying Depiction: Historian Assesses 34-Year-Old Civil War Movie Battles